
Originally Posted by
navigator
I'm no hillbilly, and I've already explained to you why the above screed (along with your Monroe Bergdorf-a-like 'whites are the most violent force of nature on the planet' rhetoric) is nonsense in a prior thread.
And you can't "make up" that which exists (race, which is a scientific fact, and the nature of humans to be 'racist', which is just a facet of primal tribalism), you can only intellectualize it.
There is no reverse racism, just racism. And, yes, black and 'ethnic minority' people are quite capable of exhibiting it, and empowered enough to frequently go unmolested for it in the modern West. A mere glance at Twitter, a giant social media institution that has exhibited shameless political/ideological bias, and where casual black racism runs rampant and more often than not unchecked, is enough to clarify that. If you doubt that that translates to real life, you might be surprised.
That Europeans have been actively trodden on by their own governments in order to grant all manner of opportunity to black and 'ethnic minority' migrants, while their right to spoken objection is effectively taken from them, is evidence enough that there is no institutional advantage afforded to 'white people' in the modern West, and that the opposite is quite often the case.
Who even uses the term "reverse racism", anyway? People who are barely out of high school, if anybody. I haven't seen the term used once here.
He didn't suggest otherwise. On the contrary, he suggested that you ban with impunity. His point was that, in his opinion, your determinations exhibit a clear bias. There may even be something to that.